• Aim of Project Bownet
• The importance of identifying the beneficial ownership
of corporate entities
• The problem addressed by Project Bownet
• How Project Bownet addresses the problem
• Who will be the stakeholders and the end-users of
Project Bownet
• What is the added value of Project Bownet
Project Bownet is a feasibility study aimed to assess
what is needed to develop an intelligent system able
to search and integrate information on:
• shareholders
• beneficial owners
• the ownership structure
• directors and members of the board
of EU listed and unlisted companies and corporate entities.
This system will serve as a support tool for Financial
Intelligence Units, Asset Recovery Offices, Law enforcement agencies,
financial intermediaries and legal professions to:
• reconstruct the ownership structure of EU companies
• identify the beneficial owners behind EU corporate
entities
• uncover complex schemes of corporate ownership such
as “Chinese boxes”
so as to improve the prevention and the fight against money laundering
and other financial crimes, and to accomplish with the obligations of
the Directive 2005/60/EC (Third AML Directive).
Complex cross-border schemes of corporate entities with a “Chinese
boxes” structure are often used by criminals and organized crime
to:
• conceal illicit flows of money
• laundering money
• evade taxes
• commit financial and accounting frauds
• create and hide slash funds
• commit bribery and corruption
The identification of beneficial owners hiding behind a
“Chinese boxes” scheme is hence crucial to prevent and
combat these types of crime, and has become a pillar of the entire
EU anti-money laundering regulatory framework.
In particular, the Third EU AML Directive (Directive 2005/60/EC) requires
intermediaries such as banks, auditors, accountants, lawyers and notaries
to identify, in the framework of the Customer Due Diligence
procedures, the beneficial owner of their clients and to
take “risk-based and adequate measures to understand the ownership
and control structure of the customer” (article 8, par. 1, letter
b).
Despite the importance of identifying BO, there are some problems which
could be summarized as follows:
1. Lack of information, at EU level, on
BO and ownership structure, in particular for unlisted corporate entities
2. Differences among countries re. transparency
requirements
3. Lack of EU integrated systems of sharing information
on BO and shareholders:
As regards the last question, it shall be noted that a single EU
database for reconstructing cross border ownership schemes does not exist,
despite on-going developments in this field (e.g. EU Project Brite).
These problems have been already identified and described by Transcrime
in its 2001 report Transparency
and Money-Laundering
, funded by EU Commission, and highilghted
again by Transcrime in 2007 in the Cost
Benefit Analysis of Transparency Requirements in the Company/Corporate
Field and Banking Sector Relevant for the Fight Against Money Laundering
and Other Financial Crime
, funded by EU Commission.
The study by Transcrime estimated the burden to be borne by financial intermediaries
and legal professions as a consequence of the Third AML Directive (Directive
2005/60/EC). In particular it highlighted that in many cases the
costs to private stakeholders are attributable to an “underestimated
gap between the crucial role assigned to the disclosure of company beneficial
ownership within the current EU anti money laundering regulation
and the actual availability of company ownership structure information
to the public authorities as well as to market agents, including those who
have reporting duties”.
The comments of the 2007 study by Transcrime are still valid. During a recent
meeting organized by EC in February 2011 to discuss Anti-Money Laundering
and Counter Terrorist Financing Policy, EU private stakeholders expressed
“concerns […] about the imbalance between the increasing
amount of information being requested by public authorities and
absence of supporting role to facilitate implementation
of rules (e.g. by establishment of consultable registers)”.
In particular stakeholders asked for the creation of public databases on
PEPs, beneficial owners, equivalent third countries, etc.
Due to the lack of data and support tools, when financial intermediaries,
legal professions, LEA and FIU want to collect information on BO
and ownership:
• either they access single national BRs (upon payment
of an expensive fee) thereafter assembling different pieces of information
from different sources in different countries;
• or use other data sources than the BR databases
(in primis documentation provided by the same companies/customers).
this results in inefficient, often unreliable and costly ways
to collect and integrate information on BO, OS and company
directors.
Project Bownet assesses what is needed to create a common
EU platform providing data on BO and ownership structure of EU corporate
entities. In particular, it understands what is needed to develop an
intelligent system able to put together information on BO and ownership
structure coming from:
• Different EU Companies registries
• Other business databases
• Newspaper / media archives
• Other non structured sources (e.g. Internet, blogs, etc)
• Whereas possible: LEA and FIU database
Specifically, the activities of Project Bownet
will aim to :
• Understand which information on BO and ownership
could be used for developing the intelligent system
• Understand which information on BO and ownership
is available at EU level, and where
• Understand how these information and data could
be put together and shared across countries/institutions
• Identify the specific needs and desires of the end-users
of the intelligent system
• Identify the technical requirements which such
an intelligent system should have
Project Bownet will provide crucial information to a number of
intermediaries and other categories of stakeholders, including:
• Financial Intelligence Units (FIU);
• Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA) specialized in dismantling
terrorist financing and financial crime organisations;
• Asset Recovery Offices (ARO);
All those obliged under the EU Directive 2005/60/EC to identify BO of their
customers, viz.:
• Credit institutions;
• Financial institutions;
• Auditors, external accountants and tax advisors;
• Lawyers;
• Notaries, Trust and company service providers;
• Real estate agencies;
• Casinos.
Other subjects:
• EU Financial supervisory authorities and financial regulators;
• Tax agencies for anti-tax evasion purposes;
• Financial journalists and news agencies;
It is evident that, beyond the scope of the EU AML regime, Project Bownet
will also bring benefits in terms of transparency and efficiency
of EU financial markets, by developing a system which could
provide more detailed information about the identity of shareholders and
investors and the nature of the business relationship.
These information will constitute privileged information for strengthening
the security and the solidity of the EU financial
system, and for preventing frauds, evasions, misuses
which could undermine the functioning and the legality of the entire EU
economy.